Workers, Are
They Assets or Expenses
Many a times, a reduction in the revenue collection often lead to
the restructuring of the operational structures, and one general viewpoint
during the restructuring process is that the employees are expenses that need
elimination. However, a different school of thought always, views the human
resources as assets that need development along with effective management. The
two viewpoints are vital not only due to their role of in influencing the
decisions of the executives when it come to the downsizing of the company staff
but also due to their role in influencing how the human resources view
themselves as well as how they carry out their duties. The attitude that arises from such
viewpoints influences the productivity of the company. The management of
companies has the capability to influence the attitude along with the morale of
the employees by subjecting them to the conditions of his choice. Better
conditions enhance the productivity of the employees while poor conditions
compromise their productivity.
The view of employees as either assets or expenses also depends on
the size of the company, and this is because in big companies, the number of
employees might outnumber the available roles, and this may lead to
under utilization of the available workforce. On the contrary, smaller companies
tend to have relatively small number of employees compared to available duties;
thus the employees in the later scenario end up being fundamental to the
operation of the company, and this makes the management of the company treat
them as assets. Due to the
approaches by different types of companies on their employees, each company
often struggle to bring in an element of balance between the expenditure and
the revenue. As a result, the smaller companies struggle to come up with ways
that will enable then to get the best from their employees while bigger
companies struggle to downsize the workforce so as to remain with just the
necessary workforce size.
For the smaller companies to maximize the available labor force,
they need to implement effective strategies that will boost the morale of the
employees, and one of such initiatives includes the development of the
employees. Offering the employees and opportunity to develop their careers, for
instance coming up with the fair as well as transparent promotional structures
and career development structures make the employees commit to the company and
work diligently. Additionally, introducing study opportunities for the
outstanding employees encourages the other members of staff to take their roles
seriously. Through such initiatives, enables the smaller companies to get the
best from their employees.
Additionally, implementation of strategies that enable the
employees to feel valued in the workplace also leads to improved productivity.
Programs like awards and recognition of the individual employee for their
efforts make them feel valued. Besides, involving the members of the staff in
major decision making concerning the companies’ progress along with the
operations of the company makes the employees to feel very much of the company,
and this makes them work hard with the intentions of protecting the values as
well as the culture of the company.
The smaller companies can also make the best use of the available
workforce by coming up with initiatives that create an interactive working
environment. This involves the elimination of numerous hierarchical levels that
hinder the flow of information between the employers and the employees.
Besides, the elimination of such hierarchical levels reduces the magnitude of
control that the managers have over the employees, and this enables all members
of the staff to express their ideas along with feeling effectively by using the
appropriate channels. The creation of interactive workstations not only
increases the bond and teamwork amongst the members of the staff but also
minimizes the chances of conflict between the workers. Besides, is also plays
down the chances of the employee rebellion and this harmony in the workplace
lead a strong, efficient along with reliable workforce, which enables the
companies to meet their set objectives.
As opposed to the smaller companies, the bigger companies face the
challenge of boosting the morale of their workforce. While downsizing might
appear to be the most viable mechanism because of the guaranteed reduction in
the expenditure in the form of wages, it comes with numerous drawbacks that may
prove to be costly in the long run. One of the shortcomings of downsizing the
workforce is the reduction of employee morale. The fear of losing jobs as well
as that of work overload after the downsizing occurs may discourage the entire
workforce, and this lowers the morale of the entire unit. As a result, the
company seems to suffer from low revenue collection due to either a reduction
in the quantity of production or due to the production of low-quality products
that cannot compete effectively in the marketplace.
Another disadvantage of downsizing is the potential loss of
finances. The employees who lose their jobs in the process of downsizing should
get the severance pay. Thus, in settling such pays as required by the labor
laws, the company suffer immense financial loss. Additionally, downsizing of
the workforce leads to a decreased productivity along with creativity, and this
is because the remaining employees often opt to reserve their skills along with
the creativity in case they too lose their jobs. Besides, the fear arising from
the potential job insecurity bars the employees from making bold decisions that
are essential in the promotion of the company’s productivity. The decrease in the
productivity, as well as the creativity, leads to the drop in production, and
this leads to a reduction in the revenue. The bigger companies, however, have
the option of retaining their workforce and coming up with mechanisms that can
transform their employees from being expenses to being assets.
The bigger companies can come up with innovative ideas of
utilizing the bigger workforce such as the creation of other sectors and
assigning the employees roles in such sectors. The management of the company
can also transfer the employees to other existing but understaffed departments.
Through such rearrangements, the company can make the employees occupied, and
this improved the productivity of the employees; thus transforming them into
assets. Additionally, the bigger companies can launch new products and utilize
their bigger workforce in enhancing the production along with the sales of the
new products. Worth noting is that the manner in which companies treat
influences the mindset along with the productivity of their workforce.
Treatment of the labor force as assets leads to better performance and
consequent increase in the revenue collection, but trading them as expenses
influences their productivity negatively, and this affects the company in the
long run.
No comments:
Post a Comment